The Trump Administration’s proposal to hold social media profiles of green card candidates have already been legally convicted in the original public reviews as an attack on freedom of expression.
Applicants for visas living abroad must already share their social media with US citizenship and immigration services, but the proposal with President Donald Trump will expand the policy of those already legal in the country who apply for a permanent residence or seek asylum.
USCIS has said that checking social media accounts is necessary to “improve identity check, check and screen national security.”
The agency also said it was necessary to execute Trump’s executive order entitled “US Protection from Foreign Terrorists and Other Threats to National Security and Public Safety”.
“In a review of information collected for adoption and benefits decisions, US Civil Services and Immigration Services (USCIS), they have determined the need to collect social media identifiers (” Handles “) and related names of the Social Media Platform by Applicants and Power Relations and Consumers with the CONTROL March 5.
President Donald Trump’s administration has suggested that social media handles be checked for immigrants who are already legally in the United States who apply for green cards or permanent citizenship. The plan was sentenced as a “violation of the first amendment”. (AP)
The agency is collecting public reviews about the proposal until May 5, the greater part of which are extremely opposite at the time of writing.
“So the United States is now turning to an authoritarian,” said an anonymous commentator. “Everything that the current administration does not like means bad. Pure ideology means complete destruction. This is a violation of the first amendment.”
“The cooling effect on freedom of speech: the fear of state control of online expression will undoubtedly suffocate the free speech,” another comment said. “This is especially concerned for people from countries with different political climate who may be afraid of misinterpreting their online activity.”
Of the 143 comments, 29 mentioned violation of freedom of expression. “This policy undermines the basic values that make America a beacon of freedom, including freedom of expression, privacy and human rights,” another person writes.
Civil rights groups expressed fears that the proposal of policy would disagree on Israel’s critics and processing the Trump administration for the conflict. This is followed by the detention of the Green Card holder Mahmoud Halil, a graduate of the University of Colombia and the organizer of protests, referred to as a “pro-Hamas” by the Trump administration. (Reuters)
The proposal is followed by the detention of the Green Card holder Mahmoud Halil, referred to as a “pro-Hamas” by the Trump administration, and the deportation of Brown University, Rasha Alaui, Visa Holder H1-B. Customs and US Border Protection staff inspected the kidney’s phone and decided that she was following the religious teachings of Hezbollah Hasan Nasarala. They also claim that she “openly admitted”, attended his funeral while in Lebanon.
Civil rights groups have expressed fears that a policy proposal would have disagreed on Israel’s critics and the US government government for the conflict.
“This policy would differently affect Muslim and Arab candidates seeking US citizenship who expressed support for human rights,” said Robert McCow, director of governmental issues at the US-Islamic Relations Council The capture. “The collection of social media identifiers of any potential candidates for a green card or citizens is a means of silencing their legal speech.”
McCow added that he was also worried that people’s activity would be constantly monitored on social media, even if they became US citizens.
Ma Yang, pictured, was deported in February to Laos, a country where she never stepped. Yang is joining a growing number of green card visas and owners in the United States, which have been swept away in the aggressive immigration repression of the Trump administration. (Facebook)
The new proposal comes as the internal revenue service is close to an agreement with immigration and application of customs to enable employees to use confidential tax data to confirm the names and addresses of the people who suspect they are illegal in the country, according to The country Washington Post.
ICE can present names of suspected illegal IRS immigrants so that the agency can refer to the confidential databases of taxpayers, according to Insiders. The agreement is “alarmed” career IRS employees who fear they risk abusing a privacy law intended to build criminal cases “not to apply penal sanctions,” the newspaper reports.
In addition to the mass deportations, the immigration repression of the Trump administration has turned its attention to green card holders in recent weeks.
Earlier this month, Fabian Schmidt, a 34-year-old German electricity engineer who had been conducting a green card since 2008, was arrested and detained at the Boston Logan International Airport.
And a mother in Milwoki, who is a permanent resident of the United States and lives here, as she was eight months, has been deported to Laos, a country where she has never been before, after agreeing to a legal basis on cannabis.