It cannot be said that Americans were not red for SUV options in 2024. Although they cost more than sedans and hatchbacks, the SUV market is increasing every year. Regardless of the problems of inflation or economic insecurity, the SUVs conveniently dominate the car landscape in the United States
With the cost of ownership-initial expenses, funding, depreciation, insurance, fuel and assorted parking fees and tickets are so expensive, cars are # 1 killer for many drivers, especially those of lower income households and individuals with fixed income.
It is good to know: 12 SUV with the most reliable engines
For you: 8 common errors retirees make with their social security checks21 affordable small cities to retire on the east coast
According to Statista, the US SUV market is expected to reach $ 333 billion this year, but with so many models, there is some value for every penny and some that should be avoided at all costs.
As for the SUV you should not buy, Gobankingrates asked the car’s carrier Chris Peel, who works as a full -time virtual mechanic at Justanswer, and Mike Winter, longtime owner of MDP Diesel & Auto Repair in Jackson, and Michigan, and Here’s what I had to say about a few SUVs/groups SUV that is not worth it to are bought.
The popular SUVS mechanics say it’s not worth the cost
-
Land Rover Range Rover
-
Land Rover Discovery
Lux Land Rover’s luxury jeeps get a bad representative when it comes to price -quality and reliability. For the experienced winter, the Range Rover model has too many concerns that make a bad choice for buyers, citing “terrible depreciation and resale value, very high repair costs … Electrical problems, coolant problems, turbo problems.”
Pyle also took Land Rover, but for him the discovery should be avoided. “They are expensive to maintain only general maintenance and when they fail, parts and work are high,” he said.
Learn more: Mechanics Explain why you should never buy these 6 popular car brands
According to Pyle, the problems of 4Runner stem from the value and washing of the intended use of the vehicle. “This is a great vehicle inside and out – a purchase that you will not be disappointed with,” he said. “The bad part is designed to be off -road and most [people] Don’t do that. So, you pay for features that are never used. It is better different and more cheaper SUVs for the stay of the highway. “
Consumer Reports (CR) uses the results of road tests and projected reliability for its vehicle analysis, but also relies on customer satisfaction (subscribers) and safety rates. So, his articles should be approached with caution. However, she named Taos the reliable vehicle at the second level for 2024, and winter agrees. Volkswagen’s compact Volkswagen Volkswagen may require frequent and expensive repairs. The price is correct (the expected 2025 MSRP should be about $ 26,000, for Kelley Blue Book), but is it worth it?
-
Jeep Cherokee/Wagoneer
-
Jeep Wrangler/Gladiator
CR listed Jeep’s Grand Cherokee and Grand Cherokee L among its 10 reliable cars for 2024 and a jeep as the worst car manufacturer of 34 marks. Winter list “Electrical Problems, Transmission Problems and Consumption of Oil” such as Cherokee trouble and believe that Wagoneer is simply “a way overrated, with a terrible depreciation”, among many problems.
As for Wrangler and Gladiator, Pyle states: “They don’t have the biggest longevity of the engine. [And] The same as 4runner, they are designed to be out of the way. The problem here is that the owners beat them off the road and then complain about the ride of the interstate. They are strong and swing, and the soft top roof flows in the rain. “
Despite the average level of repair reliability, in the experience of winter, Tucson is a “time bomb” due to “major engine/transmission problems and a high degree of engine damage”. As Copilot notes, Hyundai has improved its reputation for reliability in recent years, so if you are keen on Tucson, avoid older years (2011, 2012, 2015-2017).
-
Ford Escape EcoBoost
-
Ford Ecosport
There are noticeable differences in the size between Ford’s Escape Ecoboost upholstery and its ecosport, both inside and outside (the ecoospport is smaller), but according to winter, the main repairs and problems with durability struck both SUVs. As for escape, “reliability is not good because of coolant problems, carbon accumulation and oil consumption,” and EcoSport is simply “terrible drive, with major problems/engine damage and high repair costs.”
-
STV-in full size SUVs (Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban, Ford Expedition, Lincoln Navigator, Cadillac Escalade)
Pyle mentioned a group of problematic SUVs in full to avoid; In particular, Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban, Ford Expedition, Lincoln Navigator and Cadillac Escalade. “They are big, heavy, not aerodynamic and drink gas,” Pyle said. “They are intended to move the family and to draw a camper. Too much [that] You own these vehicles rarely have more than four inhabitants and never draw anything. You pay a lot to get a lot, but it’s not what you really need. “
-
Luxury high -end SUVs (Range Rover Evoque, Mercedes G550/GLS/EQS, Audi RS Q8, Lexus LX, BMW X7)
Pyle took the time to deal with a few luxury jeeps. Range Rover Evoque, Mercedes G550/GLS/EQS, Audi RS Q8, Lexus LX and BMW X7 “are too expensive,” Pyle said. “There are SUVs at a lower price, just as nice with similar features with the price of tens of thousands less. Plus, you don’t have a hassle to find a shop that will actually touch it when it breaks. Buying a vehicle over $ 100,000 is dumb and most of which is too high. “
More from Gobankingrates
This article originally appeared on gobankingrates.com: I’m a mechanic: 11 SUV I would never buy and why they don’t deserve