How do American buyers of critical minerals circumvent the ban on China’s export

Beijing (Reuters) – Unusually large quantities of antimony – metal used in batteries, chips and flames – have been poured into the United States from Thailand and Mexico since China blocked US supplies last year, according to customs and shipping records, which are at least one company owned by China,

China dominates the delivery of antimony as well as to Galius and Germany used in telecommunications, semiconductors and military technology. Beijing banned the export of these minerals to the United States on December 3 after Washington’s repression for the Chinese chip sector.

The resulting change in commercial flows emphasizes the struggle for critical minerals and China’s struggle to impose its curbs, as it agrees with the United States as economic, military and technological supremacy.

Moreover, commercial data illustrate the redirection of consignments in the United States through third countries – admitted that Chinese employees have admitted.

Three experts in the industry have confirmed this assessment, including two executives in two US companies who have told Reuters that they have received limited minerals from China in recent months.

The United States has imported 3834 metric tonnes of antimony oxides from Thailand and Mexico between December and April, US customs data show. It was more than almost the previous three years combined.

Meanwhile, Thailand and Mexico launched the three best export markets for Chinese antimony this year, according to Chinese customs data in May. None of them made the top 10 in 2023, the last full year before Beijing restricted exports.

Thailand and Mexico have a single antitrust meal, according to the consulting RFC Ambian, and the latter is only open in April. None of the mineral mines of metal.

The American imports of antimony, Galius and Germany this year is about to equal or exceed the levels before the ban, albeit at higher prices.

Ram Ben Zion, co -founder and executive director of the Publican Digital Digital Suppliers Platform, said that although there is clear evidence of transfer, commercial data does not allow the identification of participating companies.

“This is a model we see and this model is consistent,” he told Reuters. Chinese companies, he added, were “super creative in the surrounding regulations”.

The Chinese Ministry of Commerce said in May that unspecified overseas organizations had “agreed with the internal offenders of the law” to avoid their export restrictions and that the suspension of such activity was essential for national security. This did not answer Reuters questions about the change of commercial flows from December.

Leave a Comment