The transfer of energy has an exalted yield of 7.4% in an industry, which has an average yield of about 3.3%.
The energy transfer business is largely managed by a model of road fees, not by the prices of goods.
Although the energy transfer business is “boring”, there are some warnings that investors need to consider before buying it.
10 shares we like better than energy transfer ›
The great equality with Transmission(Nyse: et) The huge yield of the Master Limited Partnership (MLP) is likely to be the huge yield. This is completely reasonable, noting that S&P 500 index (Snpindex: ^gspc) There is an accident of only 1.2%, and the average yield of energy reserves is only 3.3%. Before you jump aboard what looks like a boring stock, you will want to know a little about the story that supports this yield.
The wider energy sector is known for being unstable due to the inherent instability of oil and natural gas prices. These two goods have a bad habit of moving both drastically and quickly based on the dynamics of demand/supply, economic trends and geopolitical problems. But the revenue of energy transfer is not linked to the prices of goods, which makes it a very reliable cash flow generator in an industry, which is anything but reliable.
Image source: Getty Images.
In essence, energy transfer has energy infrastructure, as pipelines that helps to move oil and natural gas around the world. This is what is known as a business in the middle stream because it sits between the upper flow (energy production) and downstream (energy processing). The energy transfer largely collects fees for the use of its assets, with volume passing through its systems more important for its financial results than the prices of goods. Given the importance of energy for modern life, the demand for energy transport tends to remain stable, regardless of energy prices.
This is the reason why the energy transfer will look like a boring dividend of many investors. And in some way, it’s exactly what it looks like. But there is a story here that you need to find out before you enter this MLP.
Starting with the first question first, the energy transfer reduced its dividend half during the drop in energy, which was precipitated by the coronavirus pandemic. This decision was made in 2020 so that the energy transfer could focus on strengthening its balance, which is a worthy reason. However, dividend investors probably hoped for the distribution to be maintained at least through the energy decline and the global health crisis. In fact, just when the sequence was the goal of investors, the energy transfer gave its units a drastic shock from income.
ET DATA DEATIONS FROM YCHARTS
To be fair, distribution is growing again. It is actually higher where it was before the cut. But one of the most overbound peers of energy transfer, Enterprise Product partners(Nyse: EPD)It does not resort to a reduction in distribution. In fact, Enterprise raised its distribution despite the pandemic. The call of Enterprise increases is already up to 26 consecutive years. If you are trying to live from the income your wallet generates, you may want to rethink the engagement to energy transfer.
However, trust problems do not stop there. Already in 2016, the last time the energy sector was faced with a material decline, an energy transfer, a transaction to buy Williams companies(Nyse: WMB)S He got cold legs and shook the deal because it may require a reduction in dividend. This was probably the right call, but it included the sale of convertible securities, a large amount of which at that time would go to the CEO. Although it never came to it, it seems that convertibles would protect the CEO from a dividend reduction, if necessary.
Conservative investors will be forgiven if they are worried about whether the energy transfer is in favor of the internal persons at the expense of the shareholders. Enterprise Products Partners has no such event in its past.
Here is the extraction of 7.4% of energy transfer is just a touch, higher than Enterprise’s yield for approximately 7%. Is it worth a 0.4 percentage of yield points to worry that energy transfer can leave investors targeted at incomes in some way? Probably not in this way this “boring” action with high profitability is probably best avoided by conservative income investors. But don’t worry; Instead, you can just go your attention to legitimately boring Enterprise Products partners.
Before you buy a stock of energy transfer, think about it:
Thehe Motley Fool stock adviser Analyst team has just identified what they think is 10 best shares For investors to buy now … and the energy transfer was not one of them. The 10 shares that made the abbreviation could lead to the return on monsters in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix Make this list on December 17, 2004 … If you have invested $ 1,000 at the time of our recommendation, You will have $ 660,783!* Or when Nvidia Make this list on April 15, 2005 … If you have invested $ 1,000 at the time of our recommendation, You will have $ 1.122 682! **
It is now worth noting Stock adviser The total average return is 1069% Market over 184% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss the latest top 10 list available when you join Stock adviserS
See the 10 shares »
*Stock Advisor since August 13, 2025
Reuben Greg Brewer has no position in any of the said shares. Motley Fool recommends partners of Enterprise Products. Motley Fool has a policy of disclosure.
1 “boring” shares offering over 7.4% annual dividend yields originally published by Motley Fool
